Online Public Transcript
for Oleg Sergin 4/19/2000
Name |
Date |
Authority |
Delphi
Programmer |
2000-04-06
|
Brainbench |
Windows
95 Power User |
2000-04-13
|
Brainbench |
Windows
98 Administrator |
2000-04-18
|
Brainbench |
High IT
Aptitude |
2000-04-13
|
Brainbench |
Written
English |
2000-04-11
|
Brainbench |
Linux
Administrator |
2000-04-18
|
Brainbench |
Windows
98 Power User |
2000-04-13
|
Brainbench |
Name |
Date |
Score (1-5) |
Additional Info. |
Linux
|
2000-04-18
|
2.87 |
Scored higher than 45% of all previous examinees.
Demonstrates a solid understanding of core concepts within this
topic. Appears capable of working on most projects in this area with
moderate assistance. May require some initial assistance with
advanced concepts, however.
Strengths
|
|
General Issues |
|
|
Installation |
|
Weak Areas
|
|
Config&Admin |
|
Sub-Category Scores |
|
Conceptual
|
2.0 |
|
Problem-Solving |
3.0 |
|
Terminology &
Syntax |
3.0 | |
Windows
98 |
2000-04-18
|
3.12 |
Scored higher than 80% of all previous examinees.
Demonstrates a solid understanding of core concepts within this
topic. Appears capable of working on most projects in this area with
moderate assistance. May require some initial assistance with
advanced concepts, however.
Strengths
|
|
Applications in
Win98 |
|
|
Printers |
|
Weak Areas
|
|
Configuring
Win98 |
|
|
Multimedia |
|
Sub-Category Scores |
|
Conceptual
|
3.0 |
|
Problem-Solving |
3.0 |
|
Terminology &
Syntax |
3.0 | |
Windows
98 User |
2000-04-13
|
3.24 |
Scored higher than 43% of all previous examinees.
Demonstrates a solid understanding of core concepts within this
topic. Appears capable of working on most projects in this area with
moderate assistance. May require some initial assistance with
advanced concepts, however.
Strengths
|
|
Control Panel |
|
|
General
Knowledge |
|
|
Managing Files and
folders |
|
|
Printing |
|
Weak Areas
|
|
Customizing the
Desktop |
|
Sub-Category Scores |
|
Conceptual
|
3.0 |
|
Problem-Solving |
3.0 | |
Windows
95 User |
2000-04-13
|
3.49 |
Scored higher than 62% of all previous examinees.
Demonstrates a solid understanding of core concepts within this
topic. Appears capable of working on most projects in this area with
moderate assistance. May require some initial assistance with
advanced concepts, however.
Strengths
|
|
Control Panel |
|
|
General
Knowledge |
|
|
Printing |
|
Weak Areas
|
|
None Noted |
|
Sub-Category Scores |
|
Conceptual
|
4.0 |
|
Problem-Solving |
3.0 |
|
Terminology &
Syntax |
3.0 | |
Programmer/Analyst Aptitude |
2000-04-13
|
3.73 |
Scored higher than 73% of all previous examinees.
Overall
Score |
3.73 |
Overall,
posesses above average abilities to perform either computer
programming or systems analysis.
|
Programmer
Score |
3.59 |
Demonstrated
above average ability to perform computer programming tasks.
|
Analyst
Score |
4.52 |
Demonstrated
exceptionally high ability to perform tasks associated with
systems analysis.
|
Mathematical
Problem-Solving |
4.76 |
Demonstrated a
superior ability to apply arithmetic to basic problem
scenarios. Can be expected to independently grasp complex
problems and to mentor others successfully.
|
Following
Instructions Precisely |
2.71 |
Demonstrated
an average abilty to follow step-by-step instructions
accurately. Will require routine supervision to ensure
compliance with specifications.
|
Attention
to Detail |
3.29 |
Demonstrated
average ability to focus on details when solving problems. May
require occasional peer and supervisory review to ensure work
quality.
|
Analytical
Reasoning |
3.36 |
Demonstrated
average analytical reasoning skills. May have difficulty
working with process-oriented problems of advanced complexity
|
Process
Modelling |
4.52 |
Demonstrated
an exceptional ability to construct graphical process models.
Can work effectively to model business processes of advanced
complexity for system design
purposes. | |
English
|
2000-04-11
|
3.09 |
Scored higher than 37% of all previous examinees.
Overall Score |
3.09 |
Demonstrated the ability to read, comprehend, and
communicate English at an intermediate level. Performed
satisfactorily in both the categories of Reading Comprehension
and Grammar and Usage. The examinee?s English skills are
average compared to all others who have taken this same test.
The examinee may experience some problems communicating in
English in their desired position. Continued study of the
English language is recommended, but not necessary.
|
Grammar
& Usage Score |
2.49 |
Demonstrated
knowledge of English Grammar and Usage at only a beginner
level. Experienced some difficulty with the overall use of
nouns, verbs, pronouns, misused words, prepositions, articles,
parallel structure, comparison, and conjunctions in sentences.
The examinee?s Grammar and Usage skills are below average
compared to all others who have taken this same test.
Continued English Grammar and Usage study
recommended. |
Strong
Areas Comparisons Conjunctions Pronouns
|
Weak
Areas Misused
Words
|
Reading
Comprehension Score |
4.46 |
Demonstrated
the ability to read and comprehend English passages at an
advanced level. Reading Comprehension skills are above the
average of those who have taken this same test. |
Strong
Areas Specific
Questions
|
Weak
Areas General
Questions
| |
Delphi 3
|
2000-04-06
|
2.8 |
Scored higher than 34% of all previous examinees.
Demonstrates a solid understanding of core concepts within this
topic. Appears capable of working on most projects in this area with
moderate assistance. May require some initial assistance with
advanced concepts, however.
Strengths
|
|
Object Pascal
Class |
|
Weak Areas
|
|
None Noted |
|
Sub-Category Scores |
|
Conceptual
|
3.0 |
|
Problem-Solving |
3.0 |
|
Terminology &
Syntax |
3.0 | |
This transcript is maintained online at
the Brainbench virtual assessment center located at
http://www.brainbench.com and features Brainbench online skills
certifications. Brainbench is the world leader in online
skills certifications, processing more certification exams annually
than any other organization. Additionally, Brainbench
certifications are recognized at many Fortune 100 organizations,
including Ernst & Young, EDS, and PriceWaterhouseCoopers.
For more information, please visit the Brainbench website at
http://www.brainbench.com. | |