Design and development of a Compact Gamma Camera
Detection of Malignant Sentinel Lymph Nodes
By: D.Lowe, A. Truman, A. Bergman and H.L.Kwok
Dept. of
Electronic Engineering, University of Victoria.
Victoria, B.C., Canada, V8W
2Y2
Abstract
Breast cancer is most often treatable when detected in the early stages, before the primary disease spreads to sentinel lymph nodes in the axilla and supraclavicular region. A sentinel lymph node is the closest adjacent lymph node to receive lymphatic drainage from a primary breast tumor. It is from these nodes that cancer cells metastasize throughout the lymphatic system, spreading the disease. This work details the design and optical Monte Carlo modeling of an ultra compact, nuclear medicine gamma camera that will be used intra-operatively to detect sentinel lymph nodes. This development will improve the identification and localization of these sentinel nodes, thereby facilitating improved techniques for auxiliary lymph node dissection (ALND), and sentinel lymph node biopsy.
I. Introduction
Breast cancer is most often treatable when detected in
the early stages, before the primary disease spreads to sentinel lymph nodes in
the axilla and supraclavicular region. A sentinel lymph node is the closest
adjacent lymph node to receive lymphatic drainage from a primary breast tumor.
It is from these nodes that cancer cells metastasize throughout the lymphatic
system, spreading the disease. This work details the design and optical Monte
Carlo modeling of an ultra compact, nuclear medicine gamma camera that will be
used intra-operatively to detect sentinel lymph nodes. This development will
improve the identification and localization of these sentinel nodes, thereby
facilitating improved techniques for auxiliary lymph node dissection (ALND), and
sentinel lymph node biopsy. The closest adjacent draining nodes to the site of a
primary tumor are known as sentinel lymph nodes. The sentinel lymph node is the
point of origin from which cancer cells
metastasize throughout the lymphatic
system, spreading the disease. In the case of breast cancer, these lymph nodes
are located in the axilla and supraclavicular regions. It is proposed that if
these diseased lymph nodes could be precisely spatially mapped using an imaging
technique offering high specificity, and then it would be possible to surgically
excise only the diseased nodes, making the surgery considerably less invasive
than would be the case with axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). A major
limitation of conventional gamma cameras is that they are not designed to be
used intraoperatively. Due to their extremely large footprint and shielding
mass, mobile gamma cameras are not commonly found in current clinical practice.
For this reason, intra-operative clinical nuclear medicine studies have seldom
if ever been performed in the OR. At the Royal Jubilee Hospital on Vancouver
Island, diagnostic imaging is performed pre-operatively and postoperatively,
but never during surgery. However, because the proposed camera under
discussion is so compact, it can be used in the operating theatre to create
diagnostic quality images in real time. This is different from a standard
intraoperative gamma probe such as a Neoprobe or C-Trak, which does not provide
an image. Our camera performs an external mapping of the region of interest,
allowing the surgeon to perform a more precise excision during surgery.
II. The Theory of Operation
The operation of a conventional gamma camera
involves the conversion of a number (N) of gamma-ray photons into an image on a
computer screen. The process starts with a radiopharmaceutical such as
99mTc-Sestamibi being injected into the patient, which is preferentially taken
up by the tumor, making the tumor more radioactive than the surrounding tissue.
Attached to the camera head, a collimator (which is simply a plate of lead with
holes in it) blocks gamma rays, which are not normally incident to the imaging
plane. Gamma rays, which penetrate the collimator, enter a scintillator, causing
flashes of visible light, which are allowed to spread in a pyrex light spreader
and then are detected by a close-packed hexagonal array of photomultiplier
tubes. The resulting data is fed into a computer where Anger Logic is used to
reconstruct an image, within which a particularly bright spot corresponds to the
site of a primary or a metastatic tumor.
The development of a hand-manipulated ultra-compact gamma camera is made
possible through a fusion of totally new hybrid technology, which permits
miniaturization of the conventional gamma camera. In our objective to
miniaturize the conventional gamma camera, we required a device that would
operate in a similar way, but be much smaller. The detector that was
specifically chosen for this application is a Multi-pixel Hybrid Photodiode
(M-HPD) manufactured by Delft Electronic Products. The M-HPD is a
position-sensitive vacuum phototube employing a hybrid of photo-multiplier and
photodiode technology, and has a sensitive area of 25 mm diameter with an
overall diameter of 52.7 mm (Figure 1). The detector has a fiber optic entrance
window, which constrains visible light spread. The imaging plane of the M-HPD is
made up of a close-packed array of 73 hexagonal PIN photodiodes (reproducing the
structure of the photo-multiplier tubes in the conventional camera). Each
hexagonal photodiode element measures 2.68 mm across flats. The signal is read
out through an array of 112 small pins on the underside of the detector
Collimated gamma-rays incident from within the patient interact through
photoelectric absorption and Compton scattering in a scintillator, which is
optically coupled to the MHPD's entrance window, causing a flash of optical
light. Many of these optical photons penetrate the fiber optic entrance window
and strike the photocathode where they are converted into photoelectrons. The
electrons are then accelerated towards the anode by an applied electric
potential of 12 kV. The impact ionization of 3.62 eV in the silicon anode
results in a gain of approximately 3000. Since the charge generated within each
anode pixel can be read out individually, the location of the vertex of each
gamma-ray interaction within the scintillator may be found using one of two
algorithms. The first, allowing sub-pixel resolution, is centroiding. This
process relies upon finding the "center of gravity" of the charge signals read
out from a group of anode pixels. The other method, known as the "Winner Take
All" algorithm requires a much simpler calculation. This algorithm requires that
the pixel with the most deposited charge be assigned the sum of the charge read
out on all 73 pixels. Spatial resolution becomes limited to the pixel size (2.68
mm), but the algorithm is fast, and can handle charge distributions, which may
lead to misleading results if decoded using centroiding. The position of
interaction determined using either of the two methods in turn correlate with
the source of collimated gamma rays originating from the radiotracer located in
the sentinel lymph
nodes. III. Testing and Measurements The first part of
the camera that gamma-rays encounter is the collimator. The collimator is
usually constructed from lead or tungsten with parallel holes drilled in it.
Gamma rays, which are not at or near normal incidence to the collimator are
absorbed and dissipated as heat. The collimator has a strong effect on the
camera's operation. If its holes are too large, the resulting resolution is
poor, meaning that some detail in the image may be lost. If the holes are too
small, the resulting sensitivity is poor, meaning that it takes a long time to
aquire an image. Because of this, an optimization must be performed so that a
design is achieved which allows an appropriate trade-off between resolution and
sensitivity. Our optimization yielded a collimator design with holes 1 mm in
diameter drilled in a 1 cm thick slab of lead. Using simulation plots and
planning on the use of a Winner Take All algorithm, we chose an acceptable
resolution value of 3.2 mm (only marginally larger than the M-HPD's anode pixel
size). To allow the flexibility of using either reconstruction algorithm, we
also wanted the holes to directly map to the anode pixels of the M-HPD. In
conjunction with a MATLAB program, we chose a hole diameter of 1 mm, with a hole
separation of 1.34 mm and a hole length of 1 cm. Since these holes were
separated by exactly half of the anode pixel diameter, and since they were
in a hexagonal array, the holes were placed such that exactly 4 of them would
map to each anode pixel. The result is a good count rate of 7.1 kHz with a hole
alignment that will allow the Winner Take All algorithm to function while
keeping misleading results to a minimum. After the gamma rays penetrate the
collimator, they enter a small puck-shaped crystal called a scintillator.
The purpose of the scintillator is to absorb the high-energy gamma-ray photons,
and release a burst of visible light. Light that it produces can be detected by
the MHPD since the scintillator is mounted in direct contact with the M-HPD's
entrance window.
The first thing that must be decided in this phase of the project is which type of scintillatorto choose. Each scintillator type produces a slightly different wavelength of light, and each photon detector type best detects a particular wavelength of light. Since the photon detector type was chosen early on in the project, this decision was based on finding a scintillator whose output wavelength best matched the peak sensitivity of the detector. This scintillator type is called Thallium doped Cesium Iodide, CsI(T1). It has an output wavelength of 565 nm, which is in the green region. The scintillator's diameter was chosen to match the diameter of the M-HPD's photocathode (27 mm), which is just slightly larger than the sensitive area of the detector. However, determination of thickness required further investigation. Software donated by Lambda Research Corporation called TracePro was used to determine the optimal thickness of the scintillator. As the thickness of the scintillator decreased, the light produced inside it was not permitted to spread very far before entering the M-HPD. As expected, as the thickness of the crystal was allowed to increase, the plot shows that the width of the light pool also increased. This is due to light being allowed to spread to a greater extent before leaving the scintillator. From the TracePro plots, it was determined that the optimal thickness of crystal would be 4 mm. This would allow the light to spread enough that a centroiding technique could be used, but not so much that a Winner Take All algorithm would yield meaningless results. Looking further into the light spread function, and knowing the characteristics of the gamma ray, the scintillator, and the M-HPD, it was possible to simulate the distribution of electrons in the pixellated anode of the M-HPD. This investigation revealed that almost 200,000 electrons would be generated in the central pixel of the detector, a value that could only be guessed at without this method. For the electronic parts of the system, the detector plugs directly into an interface board, which in turn plugs directly into a "front-end board" (Figure 3). The head of the camera is shielded against gamma rays coming from any direction except through the collimator (Figure 4). The front-end board acts as a preamplifier for the smallsignals produced by the detector. These signals then pass to a controller board, which acts as an interface between the computer and the front-end board. It also is responsible for sending control signals to the front-end board. Finally, the signals are passed to an analogue to digital converter, which resides inside of a computer. Once the information is inside the computer, it isdecoded and reconstructed in order to produce an image, which is viewed by a surgeon. The electronics for this project were custom designed specifically for this project by a Norwegian company called Integrated Detector and Electronics (IDE). IDE understood our requirements to have the circuitry fit into a camera with dimensions appropriate for hand-manipulation, and designed the electronics specifically to "hide" behind the M-HPD. Only the electronics that needed to be near the detector were placed on the front-end board, thus minimizing the size. All other control electronics were placed in a remote box on the control board, which was referred to on the previous panel. This board is called the MCRI board (see Figure 5).
On the front-end board (a close-up is shown in Figure 6) can be found 3 chips
manufactured by IDE called VA/TA chips (Figure 7). Each chip can handle 32 input
channels; so three of
them are daisy-chained together to allow the capture
of 96 input channels (of which we only use 73). These chips do the work of
triggering the readout sequence to begin, as well as amplifying the extremely
small signals produced by the M-HPD. Our electronics are capable of a read-out
frequency of 5 million samples per second, which is more than enough for this
project and allows for the possibility of higher activity detection in the
future. As visible light traverses material boundaries, reflections can be
minimized if the material the light is entering has a refractive index
equal to or higher than the material it is leaving. This concept was used while
looking to the future of our camera. We found that the use of a segmented
CsI(T1) scintillator (index=1.79)
coupled to a Cerium doped YAP, M-HPD
entrance window (index=1.94) increases light collection efficiency of the camera
from 46.6% to 82.5%. Potentially, this could allow the camera to produce sharper
images due to the higher intensity light.
While the unusual looking light spread function (shown left) produced by this setup was a surprise, we soon theorized that it may be possible to use the lobes of the function to expand the sensitive area of the camera beyond the sensitive area of the detector. The charge distribution simulation (right) confirmed these conceptual design principles, which will be incorporated into our next generation gamma camera.
Acknowledgement: The authors would like to
express their appreciation to
BCHRF (Canada)
for the financial support.