Colloidal coal in water suspensions

Gustavo A. Nunez, Maria I. Briceno, Daniel D. Joseph. and Takeshi Asa


Èñòî÷íèê: Nano Dispersions Technology, Inc., Bldg. 231, City of Knowledge, Clayton, Panama. Department of Aerospace Engineering and Mechanics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA and Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of California, Irvine, California 92617, USA.
http://www.aem.umn.edu/people/faculty/joseph/archive/docs/390.pdf


Abstract

In this paper we discuss the possible clean coal applications of colloidal dispersions of coal in water (CCW) that we manufacture with a proprietary wet-comminution device. These dispersions are a new material because the coal particles do not settle but are held in suspension by Brownian motions. The closest coal water slurries used previously are dispersions of micronized coal with mean particle sizes greater than fifteen microns; these dispersions are not colloidal because the particles settle rapidly under gravity leaving clear water behind. A new material like CCW has a possibly vast but unknown field of applications in improvements and strategies for new clean coal technologies.

Keywords:
ñolloidal coal suspensions, clean coal technologies, new fuels

Introduction

In this paper we discuss the possible clean coal applications of colloidal dispersions of coal in water (hereafter called CCW), which we are able to manufacture cheaply and in large quantities with a proprietary wet-communition device. These dispersions are a new material because the coal particles do not settle but are held in suspension by Brownian motions (see Fig. 6 in section IV). The closest coal water slurries used previously are dispersions of micronized coal with mean particle sizes greater than fifteen microns; these dispersions are not colloidal because the particles settle rapidly under gravity leaving clear water behind. A new material like CCW has a possibly vast but unknown field of applications in improvements and strategies for new clean coal technologies.
Because coal is cheap and abundant (per million BTU, compared with natural gas and oil), its global consumption will likely increase under any foreseeable scenario as described in Ansolabehere et al. (2007). Its low cost and wide availability also make it particularly attractive in major developing economies for meeting their energy needs.
However, the combustion of coal introduces pollutants harmful to the environment; the reduction of harmful pollutants in the combustion of coal is the goal of clean coal technologies. Our study targets the possible applications of CCW in these technologies.

Colloidal coal in water (CCW) is a new material

In the work that follows, we will be describing the development and production of a colloidal or nano suspension of coal in water. While at first glance this could be considered a coal water fuel, its attributes are entirely different from any coal slurry known thus far and it can be considered a new material, yet to be tested. The fact that this material has a large population of colloidal particles conveys properties never seen before in coal water fuels, such a non-settling behavior even after several months of storage. Brownian motions and particle entanglements prevent settling.
The macro-view of the fuel is that of a uniform, non-particulate liquid. This allows for various things. Flow can be controlled with great precision (this is also a plus in applications such as gasification) and the time scale of particle combustion is reduced along with an increase in particle reactivity (Davies et al., 1999).
As will be further described later, this material is different from other types of milled coal, such as micronized coal (DOE-Report NETL, 2001). The latter has no significant submicron particles, as opposed to the material advanced here. A colloidal suspension of coal in water can address the issues associated with firing coal in LSD and CCGT.

Coal-cleaning

The first step of the road to an ultra clean coal water fuel has to do with cleaning. There are well-established commercial coal-cleaning technologies (Harrison et al., 2002) with many different approaches. Physical cleaning is typically used to reduce ash levels to around 8% and coal preparation plants incorporate a wide array of solid-liquid separation equipment. The type of process may vary considerably from coal to coal. In general, however, coal cleaning involves the separation of carbonaceous material from mineral matter by settling or by froth flotation. The key of the process is the degree of liberation of the coal from the mineral. The process described in this work mills coal to colloidal sizes by comminution, in the presence of water. This process can help improve mineral separation and enhance both physical and chemical cleaning procedures that are sensitive to particle size. Froth flotation and ash removal by chemical means are examples of this type of operations where reaction rates and efficiencies, as well as flotation, can be influenced by size.

Reduction of wear

Large hard coal particles have been known to induce wear in cylinder walls of diesel engines and turbine blades (Wibberley et al., 2008). This means that coal cleaning for mineral matter is not enough to prevent wear. The coal particles must be very small. The colloidal suspension of coal advanced here has a large population of very small particles. This is an important and useful feature not only in terms of settling properties and overall stability. It can also help establish combustion patterns such that whatever particle outside the submicron domain would burn in a space heavily populated by very small burning particles that in turn aid the combustion of the larger particle (this is still a research issue that will be addressed later). Another property of polydisperse CCW is that the colloidal population acts as a “pseudo” fluid that impedes the settling of larger particles.
Another important advantage of the colloidal particles is related to the possibility of reducing the water content of the fuel. Traditional slurries prepared with say, a grind of 200 mesh (less than 75 ?m), are very difficult to make with less than 40% water due to particle packing limits and particle interactions that strongly increase the viscosity. When a large fraction of submicron particles exists, the addition of specific amounts of larger particles allow for a reduction in water content without an associated viscosity increase, by modifying the maximum packing fraction of the particulate system.

References

  1. Ansolabehere S, Beer J, Deucht J, Ellerman D, Katzer J, Friedman J, Herzog H, Jacoby, H., Joskow, P., Mcrae, G., Lester, R., Moniz, E., Steinfeld, E. 2007. The Future of Coal: Options for a Carbon-Constrained World. MIT Press.
  2. Boylu F, Atesok G, Dincer H. The effect of carboxylmethyl cellulose (CMC) on the stability of coal-water slurries. Fuel, 84, 315-319 (2005). Boylu F, Atesok G, Dincer H. Effect of coal particle size distribution, volume fraction and rank on the rheology of coal–water slurries. Fuel Processing Technology, 85, 241– 250 (2004).
  3. Cheng J, Zhou J, Li Y, Liu J, Cen K. Effects of pore fractal structures of ultra fine coal water slurries on rheological behavior and combustion dynamics. Fuel, 87, 2620-2627 (2008).
  4. Cooper J. Direct conversion of coal and coal-derived coal cells in fuel cell. Presentation to The Washington Coal Club, (2004).
  5. Davis KA, Valentine JR, Eddings EG, Heap MP. Evaluating the effects of low-NOx retrofits on carbon in ash levels. Reaction Engineering International. Mega Symposium: EPRI-DOE-EPA, Combined Utility Air Pollutant Control Symposium, Atlanta, August 16-20, 1999.
  6. Dincer H, Boylu F, Sirkeci A, Atesok G. The effect of chemicals on the viscosity and stability of coal water slurries. International Journal of Mineral Processing, 70, 41– 51 (2003).
  7. Harrison C, Akers D, Maronde C. Fuels technology update. US-DONETL Report, Feb. (2002).
  8. Holt N, Booras G, Todd D. Summary of recent IGCC studies of CO2 capture and sequestration. MIT Sequestration Forum IV. Cambridge, Mass. (2003). Khodakov GS. Coal-water suspensions in power engineering. Thermal Engineering, 54(1), 36-47 (2007).
  9. Mishra SK, Kanungo SB, Rajeev. Adsorption of sodium dodecyl benzene sulfonate onto coal. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 267, 42–48 (2003). Longlian C, Liqian A, Gong W, Hejin J. A novel process for preparation of ultra-clean micronized coal by high pressure water jet comminution technique. Fuel, 86 (5-6), 750- 757 (2007).
  10. Ono T. Improved Coal Pulverization Method Using the Embrittlement due to Cracks Generated in Pores of Coal. Kona, 212, 202-207 (2003). Ono T. High-concentration coal/water mixture fuel and process for production thereof. US Patent 6,083,286, 2000.
  11. Probstein R.F. In chapter 9, pp. 298, second edition. Physicochemical Thermodynamics. Wiley Interscience, New York, 1994. Simeon J. Economical potential of coal-water mixtures. ICEASIE 8, London, UK. IEA Coal Research, September 1985.
  12. Sekar RR, Marr WW, Schaus JE, Cole RL, Marciniak TJ. Diesel engine experiments with oxygen enrichment, water addition and lower-grade fuel. Energy Conversion Engineering Conference. Proceedings of the 25th Intersociety. Volume 4, Issue 12-17, Aug 1990, 320 - 325.
ÍÀÇÀÄ