Projects Projects Links Certificates

Это копия моего "личного дела" с сервера Brainbench. Оригинал можно посмотреть здесь.
April 19, 2000

Online Public Transcript for
Oleg Sergin 4/19/2000

Current Certifications
Name Date Authority
Delphi Programmer 2000-04-06 Brainbench
Windows 95 Power User 2000-04-13 Brainbench
Windows 98 Administrator 2000-04-18 Brainbench
High IT Aptitude 2000-04-13 Brainbench
Written English 2000-04-11 Brainbench
Linux Administrator 2000-04-18 Brainbench
Windows 98 Power User 2000-04-13 Brainbench

Completed Assessments
Name Date Score (1-5) Additional Info.
Linux 2000-04-18 2.87

Scored higher than 45% of all previous examinees.

Demonstrates a solid understanding of core concepts within this topic. Appears capable of working on most projects in this area with moderate assistance. May require some initial assistance with advanced concepts, however.

Strengths
General Issues
Installation
Weak Areas
Config&Admin
Sub-Category Scores
Conceptual     2.0
Problem-Solving    3.0
Terminology & Syntax    3.0
Windows 98 2000-04-18 3.12

Scored higher than 80% of all previous examinees.

Demonstrates a solid understanding of core concepts within this topic. Appears capable of working on most projects in this area with moderate assistance. May require some initial assistance with advanced concepts, however.

Strengths
Applications in Win98
Printers
Weak Areas
Configuring Win98
Multimedia
Sub-Category Scores
Conceptual     3.0
Problem-Solving    3.0
Terminology & Syntax    3.0
Windows 98 User 2000-04-13 3.24

Scored higher than 43% of all previous examinees.

Demonstrates a solid understanding of core concepts within this topic. Appears capable of working on most projects in this area with moderate assistance. May require some initial assistance with advanced concepts, however.

Strengths
Control Panel
General Knowledge
Managing Files and folders
Printing
Weak Areas
Customizing the Desktop
Sub-Category Scores
Conceptual     3.0
Problem-Solving    3.0
Windows 95 User 2000-04-13 3.49

Scored higher than 62% of all previous examinees.

Demonstrates a solid understanding of core concepts within this topic. Appears capable of working on most projects in this area with moderate assistance. May require some initial assistance with advanced concepts, however.

Strengths
Control Panel
General Knowledge
Printing
Weak Areas
     None Noted
Sub-Category Scores
Conceptual     4.0
Problem-Solving    3.0
Terminology & Syntax    3.0
Programmer/Analyst Aptitude 2000-04-13 3.73

Scored higher than 73% of all previous examinees.

Overall Score   3.73
Overall, posesses above average abilities to perform either computer programming or systems analysis.
Programmer Score   3.59
Demonstrated above average ability to perform computer programming tasks.
Analyst Score   4.52
Demonstrated exceptionally high ability to perform tasks associated with systems analysis.
Mathematical Problem-Solving   4.76
Demonstrated a superior ability to apply arithmetic to basic problem scenarios. Can be expected to independently grasp complex problems and to mentor others successfully.
Following Instructions Precisely   2.71
Demonstrated an average abilty to follow step-by-step instructions accurately. Will require routine supervision to ensure compliance with specifications.
Attention to Detail   3.29
Demonstrated average ability to focus on details when solving problems. May require occasional peer and supervisory review to ensure work quality.
Analytical Reasoning   3.36
Demonstrated average analytical reasoning skills. May have difficulty working with process-oriented problems of advanced complexity
Process Modelling   4.52
Demonstrated an exceptional ability to construct graphical process models. Can work effectively to model business processes of advanced complexity for system design purposes.
English 2000-04-11 3.09

Scored higher than 37% of all previous examinees.

Overall Score   3.09
Demonstrated the ability to read, comprehend, and communicate English at an intermediate level. Performed satisfactorily in both the categories of Reading Comprehension and Grammar and Usage. The examinee?s English skills are average compared to all others who have taken this same test. The examinee may experience some problems communicating in English in their desired position. Continued study of the English language is recommended, but not necessary.
Grammar & Usage Score   2.49
Demonstrated knowledge of English Grammar and Usage at only a beginner level. Experienced some difficulty with the overall use of nouns, verbs, pronouns, misused words, prepositions, articles, parallel structure, comparison, and conjunctions in sentences. The examinee?s Grammar and Usage skills are below average compared to all others who have taken this same test. Continued English Grammar and Usage study recommended.
     Strong Areas
        Comparisons
        Conjunctions
        Pronouns
     Weak Areas
        Misused Words
Reading Comprehension Score   4.46
Demonstrated the ability to read and comprehend English passages at an advanced level. Reading Comprehension skills are above the average of those who have taken this same test.
     Strong Areas
        Specific Questions
     Weak Areas
        General Questions
Delphi 3 2000-04-06 2.8

Scored higher than 34% of all previous examinees.

Demonstrates a solid understanding of core concepts within this topic. Appears capable of working on most projects in this area with moderate assistance. May require some initial assistance with advanced concepts, however.

Strengths
Object Pascal Class
Weak Areas
     None Noted
Sub-Category Scores
Conceptual     3.0
Problem-Solving    3.0
Terminology & Syntax    3.0

This transcript is maintained online at the Brainbench virtual assessment center located at http://www.brainbench.com and features Brainbench online skills certifications.  Brainbench is the world leader in online skills certifications, processing more certification exams annually than any other organization.  Additionally, Brainbench certifications are recognized at many Fortune 100 organizations, including Ernst & Young, EDS, and PriceWaterhouseCoopers.  For more information, please visit the Brainbench website at http://www.brainbench.com.