|
The magistracy has started appearing in my mind rather late than early. I’ve begun thinking things over since the
year before entering to it. Certainly, university has built up my character and made me disciplined up to the moment
of entering to the magistracy. Besides that I’ve been humorous and optimistic person. And the average mark like
4.96 as a result of 4 years of studying is not more than a mere formality.
Significantly more responsible and creative question is choosing subject area of the MPhil. As for me there were
several master factors in solving this question:
- job trends and relevance of theme in future
- my interest to the theme
- authority of scientific adviser in my opinion
I had first-hand knowledge about Feldman Lev Petrovitch. Our first meeting took place when I was on the
3-rd course of studying in the university. There was his subject that called “Numerical methods and mathematical
programming packages”. I was surprised by his huge experience in the field of planning, organization and arrangement
of numerical computation experiments.
The activity of choosing of theme and supervisor of studies wasn’t simple. But now I have no reasons for the regretting.
It should be mentioned that much time was spent for choosing of the scientific adviser and theme of the MPhil. I had no
desire for doing uninteresting for me work. I wish I could apply my experience in programming during the driving away
at MPhil. Simple reiteration of the shown results isn’t allowably in principle for me.
|
