|
|
|
Malyarchik Tatiyana Yrievna
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANNOTATION 1. Introduction. The analysis of an actuality. Investment activity is inherent in any enterprise. Importance of the economic analysis for planning and realization of investment activity is difficult for estimating. The preliminary analysis is special importance. It is spent at a stage of development of investment projects and further acceptance of the reasonable and decision-making process. Decision-making process on an investment becomes complicated following factors: plurality of accessible variants of capital investments; Limitation of financial resources for investment; the risk application-specific with decision-making process on investment, and ect. The degree of the responsibility is various for acceptance of the investment project . Often decisions should be accepted in conditions when there is a number of alternative. In this case it is necessary to make a choice of one or several projects, being based on any criteria. It is obvious, that such criteria can be more than one, and the probability of that any one project will be more preferable than others by all criteria, much less unit. Therefore there is a problem of optimization of an investment portfolio. It is necessary to give for investors an economic substantiation of capital investments, therefore activity on system engineering of investment projects estimation is actual. Investment activity is always carried out in conditions of uncertainty which degree can vary considerably. Therefore decisions are accepted on an intuitive logic footing often , but, it should be supported with economic calculation. Therefore the system of investment projects efficiency and risk estimation is necessary for work of the head, the investor, the manager. 2. The objectives and tasks. Overall objective of developed strategy is development the tool of a choice the project by efficiency and the risk, connected with use of investments, on the basis of methods and models of the investment analysis. Used models are called to provide optimization of decisions in strategic aspects of investment management. Tasks of the investment analysis consist: in a substantiation of expediency of the investment project; in a choice of the optimum project from possible alternatives; in an estimation of efficiency and maintenance of profitableness of the project through the certain period; in an estimation of a degree of risk of the investment project. The basic stage is calculation of parameters of efficiency of the future investments in an estimation the investment project efficiency. Besides a parameter of risk is calculation the purpose of increase the investment strategy efficiency. 3. Choice the method of efficiency investment projects estimation. Most the wide circulation in a world and domestic practice was received with a technique of an estimation of real investments on the basis of system of the following interconnected parameters: net present value; Profitability Index; Payback Period; internal rate of return; Discounted Payback Period; Modified Internal Rate of Return; arrange Rate of Return . It is obvious, that each of the aforecited parameters has the distinctive advantages and imperfections, therefore for acceptance of the proved investment decisions sharing the given parameters as they allow the person making a decision with the different sides is necessary to efficiency of the investment project estimate. Such estimation can be expressed as a total estimation of all parameters i.e. if as a result of calculations not less than 60 % of parameters will appear positive it is possible to consider the project effective, otherwise - inefficient. Thus, the offered approach to reception of the investment decision will enable on the basis of the generalized parameter from different directions to estimate investment projects and to make the final decision on their efficiency. 4. Choice the method of risk investment projects estimation. For risk investment projects estimation in the classical analysis are used qualitative (the analysis of relevance of expenses, a method of analogies, a method of expert estimations) and quantitative (a statistical method, the analysis of sensitivity, a method of check of stability, a method of scripts, imitating modelling, a method of updating of the rate of discounting) methods of risk estimation. However qualitative methods allow to consider possible high-risk situations and to describe all variety of risks investment project, but results of an estimation possess not so high objectivity and accuracy. Use of quantitative methods enables to receive a numerical the project riskiness estimation, to define a degree of influence of risk factors on its efficiency. It is possible to carry necessity of presence of great size of the initial information for the long period of time (a statistical method); complexities at definition of laws of distribution of researched parameters and resultant parameters (a statistical method, a method of Monte-Carlo); the isolated consideration of change of one factor without taking into account influence of others (the analysis of sensitivity, a method of check of stability), etc. Also it is obvious, that the requirement of determinancy of entrance data is unjustified simplification of a reality as any investment project is characterized by set of factors of uncertainty. Factors of uncertainty define of the project risk. Overcoming of these imperfection probably at use of the theory of the fuzzy sets, allowing to generate a full spectrum of scripts the investment project realization. From considered above it is possible to draw a conclusion, that due to decrease in a level of uncertainty the degree of risk decreases. Thus, the investor has an effective tool of the control investment process efficiency. It is visible also, that the more considerably uncertainty of initial data, the hight risk. Therefore in some cases the investor is simply obliged to refuse decision-making and to take additional measures on struggle against uncertainty. The investor can interpret values as linguistic variable, and thus designate for itself border behind which uncertainty ceases to be comprehensible. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
© 2007 DonNTU, Malyarchik Ò.Y. |