DonNTU   Masters' portal





Abstract

Table of contents

Introduction

Nowadays an effective program of fund's distribution is the primary goal of any trading system, which is somehow related to the reinvestment of profits [1].

There are two directions for traders of optimizing their trading strategy. The first and most important task is to achieve a positive expected risk-adjusted returns, the second – the definition of what percentage of capital he can risk in each transaction [2]. A subsystem of dynamic money management (DMM) is widely used in solving this problem, it’s based on the mathematical models and allows to multiply the initial capital with a maximum speed of the risk.

Money management is the process of analyzing trades for risk and potential profits, determining how much risk, if any, is acceptable and managing a trade position (if taken) to control risk and maximize profitability [3].

1. Theme urgency

Some traders think by mistake that money management is only intended for those who trade on a regular basis or only in the short term. However, there is no type of trade, where it would be impossible to apply the methods of money management [4].

Although the problem of effective money management occurred in Ukraine in the 90s of the 20th century, when a national stock market began to form, currently insufficient attention is paid to the practical application of the algorithms of DMM. Some traders prefer to apportion the fixed part of a trading account for trade, they don’t taking into account the question of the optimal amount, which can be used at a given level of risk.

Thus, the dynamic money management can be used in evety economic system, which invests its capital into the environment. It is represented by a number of algorithms, differing from each other on the complexity of its implementation, efficiency, applicability to control a particular economic system. Therefore, before making a decision it is necessary to analyze the effectiveness of each method on a number of indicators to select the most appropriate [1].

2. Goal and tasks of the research

The goal of this study is a comparative analysis of dynamic money management algorithms on the basis of the test profitability sequence of economic system based on several criteria.

Main tasks of the research:

  1. Consider two economic system functioning models.
  2. Conduct analysis of known algorithms DMM, identify their strengths and weaknesses.
  3. Analyze the criteria for evaluating the effectiveness of DMM algorithms, identify their features.
  4. A comparative experimental research of DMM algorithms based on the number criteria for two models.
  5. To conclude the feasibility of using DMM algorithms for the economic models.
  6. Determine the most efficient DMM algorithm for each of the models.

Research object: DMM algorithms efficiency indicators for managing capital economic system.

Research subject: comparative analysis of DMM algorithms on a number of criteria.

3. Review of Research and Development

The idea of money management occurred in 18th century in Daniel Bernoulli’s research (1738), where he noted that, as a consequence of this, when profits are reinvested, in order to measure the value of risky propositions one should calculate the geometric mean [2]

The mathematician John von Neumann and economist Oskar Morgenstern worked in this field and wrote Theory of Games and Economic Behavior (1944). Now a classic book, this is the work upon which modern-day game theory is based.

HarryMorgenstern Markowitz made a great contribution to portfolio theory, first proposed a mathematical model of optimal portfolio, which allows to determine the maximum profitability of the portfolio at a given level of risk portfolio and vice versa. Developed a criterion (Markowitz Criterion), reflecting the ratio of profitability-risk in the formation of an investment portfolio, taking into account the reinvestment of income.

Further development of the idea of money management continued the scientist Larry John Kelly Jr., who brought together game theory and information theory when he published A new interpretation of information rate (1956). He offered financial betting strategy called the Kelly criterion [2]

Edward O. Thorp. worked a lot in this direction, developing Kelly’s researches.

Particular interest present the works of Ralph Vince: Portfolio Management Formulas (1990), The Mathematics of Money Management (1992), A new approach to capital management (2003) and The Handbook of Portfolio Mathematics (2007),where he popularized and expanded the Kelly formula under the guise of a method for determining the position, which he called optimal f.

Bellman, Kalaba, Briman, Walden, Hakansson, Samuelson, Finkelstein, Whitley, Karatzas, Shreve, Zimba, Anderson, Jones, Stendhal, Zamansky, etc. worked in this area [2]

Not so many works of CIS countries' authors, who study the problem of managing capital, are known. Representative of this trend is Zhdanov I. (2009), who suggested that capital management techniques, based on approaches that use the principles of trading strategies and the various indicators (such as money management with the help of moving average money management using MACD, money management through channels and etc.). These techniques are very effective in combination with a successful trading system, trader, helping to increase the overall return on capital [2]. M. Babich, A. Gournac,V. Kovalev,A. Tereshchenko can be also attributed to the russian and ukrainian authors working in this field [5].

In the Donetsk National Technical University professor Alexander Smirnov with his of the develop of money management issues, as well as conducting research on the subject.

4. Research for the theme of master's work

In the master's work a comparative analysis of new dynamic capital management algorithms is taken on the basis of two test profitability sequences, which are represented in the form of yield curves. The yield curve – a graphic representation of changes in the values of P & L (Profit and Loss) at a certain time period.

Some traditional models are used in the study :

  1. R. Vince optimal f algorithm;
  2. Algorithm without DMM with a fixed value f const =0,2;
  3. Algorithm without DMM with a fixed value f const=1.

Ralph Vince model consists of finding the optimal part of investor’s capital, which corresponds to the maximum value of the multiplier of the initial capital (TWR – the ratio between final and initial state of the account of the investor):

where f – part of the capital for reinvestment, i.e. the unknown quantity;

(-P&Li) – losses or profits, taken with the opposite sign;

P&Lj – the most significant loss [6].

The value of the optimal f ranges from 0 to 1 and presents a fear of the investor before the probability of loss. Accordingly, when f =1 the investment risk is minimal, and f =0 is not profitable to the investor to risk hisk capital. Despite the fame, the model proposed by R. Vince has its negative sides and its application in practice is difficult [6].

Traditional algorithms for investors with a fixed value f const determine constant unchanging part of the capital for reinvestment, which characterizes only the fear of the investor before the investment risk, but does not assess them [7].

There were also implemented the original DMM algorithm:

  1. Evaluation sliding share ratio of profitable trades in the total amount in the range of analysis;
  2. Evaluation sliding ratio of average profitability of winning trades to average profitability of losing trades on the interval analysis.

The most important step in capital managing is to evaluate its effectiveness, which is made on a number of indicators used in calculating the value of return and risk. Profitability is one of the most important criteria of money management efficiency. However, in addition to profitability is the reverse side – the risk, do not record it in the evaluation of the effectiveness can distort reality [8]. Analysis of the effectiveness of money management algorithms is held by the following [7]:

  • Getting the highest level of the average profitability () at the end of the observation period;
  • Achieving the lowest value of standard deviation (minimum investment risk) return () in the range of the study:

    where Di – the i-th profitability,

    – average value of income (calculated from the autoregressive equation, which is obtained by least-squares method from the values Di),

    n – total amount of returns.

    Average profitability and standard deviation rates

    Figure 1 – Average profitability and standard deviation rates
    (animation: 10 frames, 5 reiterations, 130 kilobytes)

  • Get the maximum Sharpe ratio at the end of the observation period (Кш ):

    where Кн – the amount of initial capital,

    r – the annual rate of return on deposits, recalculated taking into account the real value of the reporting period.

  • Achieve maximum profit factor (PF ) during operation of the system:

    where n+ – number of profitable trades

    n- – number of losing trades.

  • Achieve a minimum ruin probability (Рраз) in the interval of the study. The ruin probability diagram of the economic system is based on the assumption that the ruin probability of an economic system – is probability to achieve the current profitability Di<= 0. Thus, the probability is calculated as tabulated integral:

    where z – the ratio of average profitability () to the standard deviation of return () .

Sharpe Ratio is used to determine how well the return of the system compensates the risk accepted by investors. And, therefore, the greater the value of this index, the less risky the algorithm.

Another key indicator of the system’s effectiveness is a profit factor (factor of profitability of the trading system) and, consequently, the greater the value of this indicator, the better the system works.

Conclusion

Qualitative multi-criteria analysis money management algorithms is a key way to increase the effectiveness of any economic system, and presents not only theoretical research but also practical interest. After all, there are many different methods and strategies in this area, but the particular interest presents dynamic money management algorithms (DMM). This is due to the numerous advantages of this subsystem:

  1. Subsystem DMM struggles and partially removes the cumulative risks when the risk is substantially large, the system with DMM reduces the investment and thus in risky situations, not investing at all.
  2. The presence of DMM subsystem, though increases the standard deviation, but it is slower than the increase in initial capital multiplier.
  3. By the criteria of TWR, PF, and Km is observed positive effect of DMM.
  4. The DMM subsystem is partially eliminates the risk and higher quality it has, the more cumulative risks are eliminated.

One of the experts in the field of risk and capital management is an American scientist R. Vince, who proposed his money management model, based on the calculation of optimal f. However, despite it is widely known, this theory has its downsides. Application of new techniques can significantly improve the efficiency of DMM algorithms by the achieving maximum profitability and minimum risk criteria and others [1].

This master's work is not completed yet. Final completion: December 2012. The full text of the work and materials on the topic can be obtained from the author or his head after this date.

References

  1. Холина А.Г. Анализ эффективности алгоритмов динамического управления капиталом. Тезисы доклада на конференцию «Информационные управляющие системы и компьютерный мониторинг – 2011».
  2. BE in trend, с использованием материалов работы Мартина Сьюэлла. История развития управления капиталом (money management) [Электронный ресурс]. – Режим доступа: http://www.beintrend.ru/money‑management.
  3. Landry D. Money Management (Pt. I):Controlling Risk and Capturing Profits [Электронный ресурс]. – Режим доступа: http://www.scribd.com/..
  4. Джонс Р. Биржевая игра – сделай миллионы играя числами. – М.: ИК «Аналитика», 2001. – 226 с.
  5. Блашкив А.А. Реферат по теме магистерской работы «Разработка и исследование подсистемы динамического управления капиталом» [Электронный ресурс]. – Режим доступа: http://masters.donntu.ru/..
  6. Смирнов А.В., Гурьянова Т.В. Об «оптимальном f» Ральфа Винса / Смирнов А.В., Гурьянова Т.В. // Научные труда ДонНТУ, серия «ИКВТ», выпуск 9 (132), Донецк, ДонНТУ, 2008. – С. 216-220.
  7. Смирнов А.В., Гурьянова Т.В. Многокритериальный анализ эффективности алгоритмов динамического управления капиталом / Смирнов А.В., Гурьянова Т.В. // Научные труда ДонНТУ, серия «ИКВТ», выпуск 10 (153), Донецк, 2009. – С. 320-323.
  8. Блашкив А.А. «Об эффективности алгоритмов динамического управления капиталом». Тезисы доклада на конференцию «Информатика и компьютерная техника».
  9. Винс Р. Математика управления капиталом. Методы анализа риска для трейдеров и портфельных менеджеров: Пер. с англ. – М.: Альпина Паблишер, 2001.
  10. MetaQuotes Software Corp. Математика в трейдинге. Оценка результатов торговых сделок [Электронный ресурс]. – Режим доступа: http://articles.mql4.com/..
  11. Джонс Р. Сила правильного управления капиталом [Электронный ресурс]. – Режим доступа: http://speculator‑fin.ru/..