Автобиография
Ссылки
Отчет по поиску
Автореферат
Электронная библиотека
Индивидуальное задание
Статья
Написать мне письмо

 ДонНТУ             Магистратура  ДонНТУ

 

The Fractal Theory of Counting and Its Implications

An examination of fractals in the context of number theory

http://www.sinc.sunysb.edu/Stu/nkilb/fractals/IChing.html

 

   

 

             This paper will demonstrate a method for or organizing numbers that relies on a simple recursive algorithm. The process outlined herein is based upon Shao Yung’s (approx. 1000 AD) (Patrick Grim, Lecture #8 Notes, State University of New York at Stony Brook: PHI.365, Fall 1998) ordering of the hexagrams of the I Ching (an ancient Chinese fortune-telling method). By demonstration of this method, it will become clear to the reader that number systems may be viewed as fractals. A fractal is an image or set that has been created by applying a simple, recursive rule to a mathematical set. The image/set will be self-similar on ascending or descending scales. This may explain why many mathematical and logical equations yield fractal images such as the Sierpinski Triangle when modeled (However, this matter will not be regarded here, as its complexity merits a study of its own). My intent is to illustrate the technique used to generate ordered sets of numbers, and give examples of a few of its computational abilities.

          First, let’s look at the idea of bases in number systems. A "base" is the number of digits that are contained in any number system. For example: A "base-3" number system contains 3 digits (0, 1, 2). So, the first few numbers in base-3 would be 0, 1, 2, 10 (worth "3" in out number system), 11 (worth "4"), etc. We use a base-10 number system, since there are 10 elementary digits in it (0 through 9). There are a few systems with other bases that have been commonly used in history. One of these is the Phoenician number system (a base-6 number system). Its influence can still be found in degrees (units of angle measure), as well as telling time (that’s why there are 60 minutes in an hour, for example). A Brief description of Shao Yung’s method: The hexagrams of the I Ching are composed of a series of six lines (fig. 1b), which may either be broken or unbroken (fig. 1a).
 
 

 

      In order to arrange the hexagrams, Shao Yung generates them one line at a time. First, we write two lines.  

2b:step 2,part 1       - -              - -                 -            -

 

Next, we duplicate each figure in the previous step,

and we add another layer on top, alternating between broken and unbroken.

     We repeat that process until we have generated 64 hexagrams.

Now, assume that the broken lines represent 0, and the unbroken lines represent 1, in a binary number system. If we observe Shao Yung’s process, it now appears as such:

          The four binary numbers shown in step 2, part 2 are equivalent to 0, 1, 2, 3 in our number system. In other words, the process has generated a sequence of numbers, much as counting would have. There are several interesting things to note about this process. First, the completion of each "step" (hereafter referred to as a generation) leaves us with an ordered series of numbers (hereafter referred to as a "Yung-Kilb Series," in honor of its founders), as I have said. Not only this, but each generation also contains all possible numbers for the amount of digits present, which are also equal to the number that designates that generation (So, in our example, generation 2 yields all possible binary numbers that are 2 digits in length).

          Therefore, by taking a mathematical set (any real number system with a base of "n"), and applying the simple recursive rule, it cranks out a Yung-Kilb set for a given number of digits of that system, depending on how many generations you carry out. In addition, each generation is similar to both the previous generation and the first generation (since it is composed of those two, and since it is an ordered series of numbers). Compare this description to the definition of a fractal given in the introduction, and you will see that it appears counting, in any base, may be reduced to a fractal.

        One possible application of this theory is for its use in base-conversion. Leibniz, when constructing his binary series, spent considerable time converting numbers from decimal (base-10) notation to binary (Redshaw). However, using my method, it’s simply a matter of following columns. Tables 3a-3c show how to convert between binary and decimal notation. First, we construct a Yung-Kilb series for decimal notation (Table 3a; Note only the first generation of the decimal system is used, since the second generation of base-10 yields a Yung-Kilb set consisting of 100 places!). Then we generate a Yung-Kilb series of approximately the same size for binary notation (Table 3b). Finally, we combine the two series’ into a single table (Table 3c). Each column within the table contains numbers of equivalent values. This process, of course, may be used to convert from any base to any other base.

 

An investigation into fractals in nature, science, and mathematics in relation to the Fractal Theory of Counting could also yield many discoveries. Therefore, this introduction of the theory is just the beginning…in time, who knows how far-reaching its implications will be?
 

bibliography

 

Brethren of Lemurian and Dolphin Logic. "Leibniz’ Life (1698-1710)." November 1996.  http://www.threeweb.ad.jp/~infoindo/leibniz/dl1698.htm (October 25, 1998)
  Garrity, Christopher. "The Book of Change." n.d. http://www.novia.net/~cgarrity/ and links. (October 26, 1998)
 
Grim, Patrick. Lecture #8 Notes, State University of New York at Stony Brook: PHI.365, Fall 1998
 
 
Kilb, Nicholas <nkilb@ic.sunysb.edu>. "exciting discovery." 14 Oct 1998. Personal correspondence with Patrick Grim <PGRIM@ccmail.sunysb.edu>.
 
 
Lofting, Chris. Dichotomies. n.d. http://www.ozemail.com.au/~ddiamond/ and links. (October 26, 1998)
 
 
Redshaw, Kerry. "Binary – So Simple Even A Computer Can Do It." Pioneers: People Who Changed The World. October 5, 1997. http://www.kerryr.net/pioneers/set_binary.htm (October 25, 1998)
 
 
Smith, Jr., Frank D. (Tony). "I Ching (Ho Tu and Lo Shu), Genetic Code, Tai Hsuan Ching, and the D4-D5-E6 Model." n.d. http://galaxy.cau.edu/tsmith/ichgene6.html and links. (October 26, 1998)
 
 
Sorrell, Roderick and Amy Max. I-Ching. http://www.teleport.com/~bioching/iching.html (October 26,1998)