UKR 
					|
					RUS
					
					Summary of research and developments
					
					 
					
					Introduction
					The 
					problem of efficient and rational money management has 
					appeared in Ukraine at the same time when the stock exchange 
					of the country has been organized. During this period the 
					process of capital investment started. It is aimed to adjust 
					normal process of economical development by means of 
					creation efficient mechanism of transformation of 
					temporarily surplus funds into loanable funds, conversion of 
					saving into capital investments.
					
					 In developed country 
					the majour originator of investment process is an 
					institution of professional traders. Services of mutual 
					funds, trusts and bond houses play the most important role 
					in the creation of funds involvement activity.
					
					This services haven't gained that much spread in the 
					domestic model of stock exchange due to some peculiarities 
					of stock conjuncture and a poor experience of using economic 
					mathematical models of money management.
					 Actuality 
					of the graduation work theme 
					Nowadays 
					there is a great diversity of money management dynamic 
					methods which are used by stockbrokers for their aims. But 
					most of them are not  reliable enough and vary much 
					from each other in speed of reaching some definite goals and 
					complicacy of implementation. In order to gain desirable 
					results and minimize risks it is necessary to analyze 
					efficiency of these methods via some certain rates and 
					factors. The results of comparison will show which one 
					satisfies traders' purposes best.
					 
					
					The goal of the 
					investigation
					
					The goal of the 
					investigation consists of getting reliable datum as for the 
					comparative analysis of dynamic methods of money management. 
					In order to do this a few problems should be solved. The 
					definite series of rates and factors are to be calculate as 
					those of :
					
					- average rate of return;
					
					- standard deviation of an 
					investment portfolio;
					
					- Sharpe ratio;
					
					- profit factor.
					
					The datum for calculation 
					will be obtained by means of model simulation.
					
					 
					
					Expected practical value of the research 
					The 
					future results of the work while used in money management 
					can provide stockbrokers with some reliable data of ways to 
					maximize future profits of investment portfolio minimizing 
					its risks or staying within some restrictions (of maximal 
					acceptable loss, amount of capital involved, time 
					restriction etc.) Besides the assumption made may be used 
					for further researches in order to optimize existing dynamic 
					algorithms of money management or offering a new one.
					
					 
					
					Survey of research and 
					developments
					
					 
					
					Survey of research and 
					developments in DonNTU
					
					 
					
					The 
					investigation of the theme of the work are conducted by 
					associate professor Smirnov Alexander, PhD jointly with  
					Guryanova and Revega. The results of their work are 
					represented in the articles "About Vince's "Optimal f" [1], 
					"New in Dynamic Capital Management" and "Multicriteria 
					Analysis of Dynamic Algorithms of Money Management" [4,5].
					
					 
					
					
					The Main propositions of Ralph Vince's 
					"optimal f" theory 
					
					
					 
					
					
					 To increase the efficiency of 
					economic system it is often used to reinvest profit returned 
					into new investment projects. This lets stockbrokers to gain 
					additional profit though deals with increasing risks. The 
					American scientist  Ralph Vince suggested the theory of 
					"optimal f" - the optimal part of capital for increasing 
					investments.
					
					He introduced such notions 
					as:
					
					
					- holding period returns 
					(HPR)
					
					-
					  profit or loss of an 
					investor (P&L)
					
					
					 HPR = 1 + P & L , 
					if profit
					
					HPR = 1 - P & L 
					, if loss
					
					
					
					 (1)
                                (1)           
					
					 
					
					where:
					
					 G
					
					and  
					
					 - is geometrical and arithmetical average 
					correspondingly
- is geometrical and arithmetical average 
					correspondingly
					
					 n - number of transactions
					
					  
					In case the profit is reinvested the geometrical average is 
					more representative than AHPR. The ratio of initial 
					and ultimate investor's funds is designate as TWR 
					(Terminal
					Wealth
					Relative):
					
					 
					
					
					 (2)
                                                      
					(2)
					
					The geometrical average is 
					designate as:
					
					 
					
					  (3)
                          
					                        (3)   
					
					
					Without any sufficient mathematical 
					proves by means of reflection R. Vince introduce the notion 
					of a share of invested funds а 
					which according to his point of view is "optimal f"  
					for 
					max TWR
					
					 
					
					
					 (4)
                                        
					(4)
					
					 
					
					 
					
					where:
					
					- f - 
					percentage of funds to be reinvested 
					
					- 
					(-P&L)  - 
					profits and loss with opposite sighns
					
					- 
					 P&Lj min - 
					the biggest loss
					
					- 
					
					opt f - 
					one of the values of 
					f , when TWR = TWRmax.
					
					 
					
					Survey of foreign research and 
					developments 
					
					There are a great 
					diversity of research on the theme abroad. Ralph Vince in 
					his work "The Mathematics of money Management. Risk Analysis 
					Techniquesfor Traders" criticizes the Kelly's formula and 
					introduce his own criteria "optimal f"-  percentage for  
					reinvestment. [3]
					
					The theory suggested by 
					Vince is criticized in the article of Leo J. Zamansky, 
					Ph.D., and David C. Stendahl "Secure Fractional Money 
					Management". The introduce their own criteria named "secure 
					f". To formulate the problem solved by secure f, they add a 
					constraint into the calculation of optimal f. The constraint 
					may reflect the acceptable maximum drawdown (and/or other 
					characteristics). This is a more conservative strategy that 
					has the benefit of finding the percent of equity invested in 
					every trade that would have yielded the highest possible 
					return subject to the acceptable maximum drawdown. This 
					formulation of the problem is such that its solution will 
					maximize TWR and guarantee that the drawdown when running 
					the system on past data does not exceed the amount defined 
					by the trader — value D. [6]
					
					 
					
					
					Conclusions
					
					
					
					For empirical researchers, the conclusion that 
					capitalization and money management may play a role in 
					determining the success or failure of speculative traders 
					cannot be ignored. The underestimation of any strategy 
					drawbacks can  result  that the propensity for 
					account balances to be reduced to zero by undercapitalizing 
					futures trading positions and possibility of this  is 
					quite high and may contribute to the failure of many 
					speculators. Finally, many works on the performance of 
					technical trading models have reported results for a single 
					futures contract for simplicity/comparability or for other 
					reasons. The research presented here allows greater 
					reconciliation between planned results and the trading 
					performance more likely to be encountered by traders with 
					respect to risk attitudes observed in behavioral finance 
					characteristics and the reinvestment of profits in 
					speculative trading.
					
					References
					 
					
					1. Смирнов А.В., Гурьянова Т.В. Об 
					«оптимальном f» Ральфа Винса. Научные труды Донецкого 
					национального технического университета, серия
					«Информатика, 
					кибернетика и вычислительная техника», 
					вып. 9 (132), Донецк, ДонНТУ, 2008. - С 216-220
					
					2. Швагер Дж. 
					Технический анализ. Полный курс. - М.: Альпина Паблишер, 
					2001. - 768с.
					
					3. Винс Р. Математика 
					управления капиталом.Методы анализа риска для трейдеров и
					портфельных менеджеров: Пер. с англ. – М.: Альпина Паблишер, 
					2001. – 400 с.
					
					4. Смирнов А.В., 
					Гурьянова Т.В. Новое в динамическом управлении капиталом. 
					Научные труды Донецкого национального технического 
					университета, серия 
					«Информатика, кибернетика и 
					вычислительная техника», 2009 (в 
					печати).
					
					5. Смирнов А.В., 
					Гурьянова Т.В. Многокритериальный 
					анализ эффективности алгоритмов динамического управления 
					капиталом. Научные труды Донецкого национального технического 
					университета, серия 
					«Информатика, кибернетика и 
					вычислительная техника», 2009 (в 
					печати).
					
					6. 
					Zamansky, Leo J., and David Stendahl [1997]. Dynamic 
					zones, Technical Analysis of STOCKS & COMMODITIES, Volume 
					15: July.
					
					7.
					Мертенс А.В. Инвестици: Курс лекций по современной 
					финансовой теории. - К.: Киевское инвестиционное агенство, 
					1997.- 416 с.
					
					8. Van K. Tharp, Ph.D.
					Special Report on Money Management/ 
					Copyright © 1997 by I.I.T.M., Inc.
					
					9. 
					Брандт З. Анализ данных. Статистические и вычислительные 
					методы для научных
					работников и инженеров: Пер. с англ. – М.: Мир, ООО «Изд. 
					АСТ», 2003. – 686 с.
					
					10. 
					Лоу А.М., Кельтон В.Д. Имитационное моделирование. Классика 
					CS. 3-е изд.: Пер.
					с англ. – СПб.: Питер; Киев: Изд. группа BHV, 2004. - 847 с.